bar image
BOP Employee Resources
Budget Information
Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA)
Health Care Resources
Media Relations
Publications
Research & Reports
Printer Friendly Version

...more Bureau facts

Related Links
BOP Library
DOJ FOIA Pages
DOJ Information Quality Guidelines
Office of Management & Budget


Adobe Reader Required to View Online Documents
Link to Adobe Website

Published
            Reports
Reports Listed By Subject:



Adobe Reader Required to View Reports Online


 
Prison Management

  • Camp, S. D. (1994). Assessing the Effects of Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction on Turnover: An Event History Approach. The Prison Journal, 74(3).

  • Camp, S. D. (2005). The Rewards and Challenges of Pursuing Research in a Correctional Agency. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 16: 1: 110-124.

  • Camp, S. D. and Gaes, G. G. (2000). Private Prisons in the United States, 1999: An Assessment of Growth, Performance, Custody Standards, and Training Requirements.

  • Camp, S. D., Gaes, G. G., Langan, N. P., and Saylor, W. G. (2003). The Influence of Prisons on Inmate Misconduct: A Multilevel Investigation. Justice Quarterly 20:3.

  • Camp, S. D. and Lambert, E. G. (2006). The Influence of Organizational Incentives on Absenteeism: Sick Leave Use Among Correctional Workers. Criminal Justice Policy review, 17: 2: 144-172.

  • Camp, S. D., Saylor, W. G., and Gilman, E. B. (1995). Aggregate Work Environment Measures and Job Separations at the Federal Bureau of Prisons. ORE report.

  • Camp, S. D., Saylor, W. G., and Wright, K. N. (1999). Creating Performance Measures from Survey Data: A Practical Discussion. Corrections Management Quarterly, 3(1).

  • Camp, S. D., Steiger, T. L., and Batchelder, J. A. (1995). Perceptions of Job Advancement Opportunities: A Multilevel Investigation of Race and Gender Effects. ORE report.

  • Lambert, E. G., Camp, S. D., Saylor, W. G., and Edwards, C. (2005). Here Today, Gone Tomorrow, Back Again the Next Day: Absenteeism and Its Antecedents Among Federal Correctional Staff. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33: 2: 165-175.

  • Saylor, W. G. (1988). Developing a Strategic Support System: Monitoring the Bureau's Performance via Trends in Key Indicators. ORE report.

  • Saylor, W. G. (1988). Developing a Strategic Support System: Putting Social Science Research into Practice to Improve Prison Management. ORE report.

  • Saylor, W. G. (1997). Modeling and Graphing Organizational Processes in Pursuit of Performance Benchmarks: Methods for Establishing and Evaluating Performance Measures. ORE report.

  • Saylor, W. G. (1995). Monitoring Organizational Performance. ORE report.

  • Saylor, W. G. (1994). The Design, Development, and Maintenance of Strategic Support Systems for Correctional Agencies. ORE report.

  • Wright, K. N., Saylor, W. G., Gilman, E. B., and Camp, S. D. (1997). Job Control and Occupational Outcomes Among Prison Workers. Justice Quarterly, 14(3).


     
    Public vs. Private Prisons back to top

  • Camp, S. D. and Daggett, D. M. (2005). Evaluation of the Taft Demonstration Project: Performance of a Private-Sector Prison and the BOP. ORE Report.

  • Camp, S. D. and Daggett, D. M. (2005). Quality of Operations at Private and Public Prisons: Using Trends in Inmate Misconduct to Compare Prisons. Justice Research and Policy, 7: 1: 27-51.

  • Camp, S. D. and Gaes, G. G. (2002). Growth and Quality of U.S. Private Prisons: Evidence from a National Survey. Criminology & Public Policy, 1:3: 427-449.

  • Camp, S. D. and Gaes, G. G. (2001). Private Adult Prisons: What Do We Really Know and Why Don’t We Know More? In D. Shichor & M. J. Gilbert (Eds.), Privatization of Criminal Justice: Past, Present and Future. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co.

  • Camp, S. D. and Gaes, G. G. (2000). Private Prisons in the United States, 1999: An Assessment of Growth, Performance, Custody Standards, and Training Requirements.

  • Camp, S. D., Gaes, G. G., Klein-Saffran, J., Daggett, D. M., and Saylor, W. G. (2001). Assessing Prison Performance from the Inmate's View: Comparing Private and Public Prisons. ORE report.

  • Camp, S. D., Gaes, G. G., Klein-Saffran J., Daggett, D. M., and Saylor, W. G. (2002). Using Inmate Survey Data in Assessing Prison Performance: A Case Study Comparing Private and Pubilc Prisons.Criminal Justice Review 27:1.

  • Camp, S. D., Gaes, G. G., and Saylor, W. G. (2002). Quality of Prison Operations in the Federal Sector: A Comparison with a Private Prison. Punishment & Society, 4: 1: 27-53.

  • Gaes, G. G., Camp, S. D., and Saylor, W. G. (1998). The Performance of Privately Operated Prisons: A Review of Research. In D. McDonald, E. Fournier, M. Russell-Einhorn, and S. Crawford, Private Prisons in the United States: An Assessment of Current Practice (pp. 1 - 41). Boston, MA: Abt Associates.

  • Nelson, Julianne (2005). Competition in Corrections: Comparing Public and Private Sector Operations. Report of the CNA Corporation.


     
    Prison Conditions and Environment back to top

  • Camp, S. D. (1994). Assessing the Effects of Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction on Turnover: An Event History Approach. The Prison Journal, 74(3).

  • Camp, S. D. (1999). Do Inmate Survey Data Reflect Prison Conditions? Using Surveys to Assess Prison Conditions of Confinement. The Prison Journal, 79(2).

  • Camp, S. D., and Gaes, G. G. (2005). Criminogenic Effects of the Prison Environment on Inmate Behavior: Some Experimental Evidence. Crime and Delinquency, 51: 3: 425-442.

  • Camp, S. D., Saylor, W. G., and Gilman, E. B. (1995). Aggregate Work Environment Measures and Job Separations at the Federal Bureau of Prisons. ORE report.

  • Camp, S. D., Saylor, W. G., and Harer, M. D. (1997). Aggregating Individual-Level Evaluations of the Organizational Social Climate: A Multilevel Investigation of the Work Environment at the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Justice Quarterly, 14(4).

  • Camp, S. D., Saylor, W. G., and Wright, K. N. (2001). Racial Diversity of Correctional Workers and Inmates: Organizational Commitment, Teamwork and Worker Efficacy in Prisons. Justice Quarterly, 18(2).

  • Camp, S. D. and Steiger, T. L. (1995). Gender and Racial Differences in Perceptions of Career Opportunities and the Work Environment in a Traditionally White, Male Occupation: Correctional Workers in the Federal Bureau of Prisons. In N. A. Jackson (Ed.), Contemporary Issues in Criminal Justice: Shaping Tomorrow’s System. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

  • Camp, S. D., Steiger, T. L., Wright, K. N., Saylor, W. G., and Gilman, E. B. (1997). Affirmative Action and the "Level Playing Field:" Comparing Perceptions of Own and Minority Job Advancement Opportunities. The Prison Journal, 77(3).

  • Gaes, G. G. (1994). Prison Crowding Research Reexamined. The Prison Journal, 74(3).

  • Langan, N. P. and Pelissier, B. M. (2001). The Effect of Drug Treatment on Inmate Misconduct in Federal Prisons. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34(2).

  • Logan, C. H. and Gaes, G. G. (1993). Meta-Analysis and the Rehabilitation of Punishment. Justice Quarterly, 10(2).

  • Saylor, W. G. (1984). Surveying Prison Environments (and Figures). ORE report.

  • Saylor, W. G., Gilman, E. B. and Camp, S. D. (1996). Prison Social Climate Survey Reliability and Validity Analyses of the Work Environment Constructs. ORE report.

  • Saylor, W. G., Gilman, E. B. and Harer, M. D. (1992). The Correspondence of Objective and Subjective Measures of Prison Climates - A "Casual" Analysis. ORE report.


     
    Drug Treatment Program Evaluations back to top

  • Cadigan, T. and Pelissier, B. M. (2003). Moving Towards a Federal Criminal Justice System. Federal Probation 67(2): 61-63.

  • Federal Bureau of Prisons (2000). TRIAD Drug Treatment Evaluation Project Final Report of Three-Year Outcomes: Part I. ORE Report.

    Chapter 1 – Introduction
    Chapter 2 – A Review of Recent Studies of High Intensity Adult Correctional Drug Treatment Programs - The Problem of Selection Bias and Possible Solutions
    Chapter 3 – A Review of Gender Differences Among Substance Abusers
    Chapter 4 – Description of Drug Treatment Programs and Services
    Chapter 5 – Research Design
    Chapter 6 – Description of Sample
    Chapter 7 – Treatment Entry and Completion
    Chapter 8 – Analyses and Results
    Chapter 9 – Summary and Conclusions
    Appendix A and B
    Appendix C: Diagnostic Plots
    Tables 1-28
    Tables 29-47
    References

  • Langan, N. P. and Pelissier, B. M. (2001). Gender Differences Among Prisoners in Drug Treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13.

  • Langan, N. P. and Pelissier, B. M. (2001). The Effect of Drug Treatment on Inmate Misconduct in Federal Prisons. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34(2).

  • Pelissier, B. M. (2000). Antisocial Personality and Depression Among Incarcerated Drug Treatment Participants. Journal of Substance Abuse, 11(4).

  • Pelissier, B. M. (2000). BOP TRIAD Drug Treatment Evaluation Three-Year Outcome Report. ORE Report.

  • Pelissier, B. M. (2002). Comparison of Background Characteristics and Behaviors of African American, Hispanic, and White Substance Abusers Treated in Federal Prison: Results from the TRIAD Study. BOP Executive Summary.

  • Pelissier, B. M. (2004). Gender Differences in Treatment Entry and Retention Among Prisoners with Substance Abuse Histories. American Journal of Public Health, 17(2): 134-141.

  • Pelissier, B. M. and Cadigan, T. (2004). Interagency Priorities at the Crossroads: Aftercare Among Drug Users. Federal Probation 68(1): 10-14.

  • Pelissier, B. M., Camp, S. D., Gaes, G. G., Saylor, W. G., and Rhodes, W. (2003). Gender Differences in Outcomes from Prison-Based Residential Treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24:1-12.

  • Pelissier, B. M., Camp, S. D., and Motivans, M. L. (2003). Staying in Treatment: How Much Difference is There From Prison to Prison? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17(2): 134-141.

  • Pelissier, B. M. and Jones, N. (2005). A Review of Gender Differences Among Substance Abusers. Crime and Delinquency 51: 343-372.

    Appendix: Characteristics Chart

  • Pelissier, B. M., Motivans, M. L., and Rounds-Bryant, J. L. (2005). Substance Abuse Treatment Outcomes: A Multi-Site Study of Male and Female Prison Programs. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 41(2): 57-81.

  • Pelissier, B. M., Rhodes, W., Saylor, W. G., Gaes, G. G., Camp, S. D., Vanyur, S. D., and Wallace, S. (2001). TRIAD Drug Treatment Evaluation Project. Federal Probation Journal, 65(3). U.S. Courts Website.

  • Pelissier, B. M., Wallace, S., O’Neil, J. A., Gaes, G. G., Camp, S., Rhodes, W., and Saylor, W. G. (2001). Federal Prison Residential Drug Treatment Reduces Substance Use and Arrests After Release. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27(2): 315-337.

  • Rhodes, W., Pelissier, B. M., Gaes, G. G., Saylor, W. G., Camp, S., and Wallace, S. (2001). Alternative Solutions to the Problem of Selection Bias in an Analysis of Federal Residential Drug Treatment Programs. Evaluation Review 25(3): 331-369.

  • Rounds-Bryant, J. L., Motivans, M. L. and Pelissier, B. M. (2003). Comparison of Background Characteristics and Behaviors of African American, Hispanic, and White Substance Abusers Treated in Federal Prison: Results from the TRIAD Study. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 35(3): 333-341.

  • Rounds-Bryant, J. L., Motivans, M. L. and Pelissier, B. M. (2003). Correlates of Drug Treatment Outcomes for African American and White Male Federal Prisoners: Results from the TRIAD Study.. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 30(3): 495-514.


     
    Education and Training Program Evaluations back to top

  • Federal Bureau of Prisons (1985). PREP: Post Release Employment Project Interim Report. ORE report.

  • Harer, M. D. (1995). Prison Education Program Participation and Recidivism: A Test of the Normalization Hypothesis. ORE report.

  • Saylor, W. G. (2004). Effect of Comparison to Random Sample from the General Population. ORE report.

  • Saylor, W. G. and Gaes, G. G. (2006). Commentary About the Scientific Merit of the Post Release Employment Project (PREP). Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, DC.

  • Saylor, W. G. and Gaes, G. G. (1997). PREP: Training Inmates Through Industrial Work Participation and Vocational and Apprenticeship Instruction. Corrections Management Quarterly, 1(2).

  • Saylor, W. G. and Gaes, G. G. (1999). The Differential Effect of Industries and Vocational Training on Post Release Outcome for Ethnic and Racial Groups. ORE report.


     
    General Program Evaluations back to top

  • Beck, J. L. and Klein-Saffran, J. (1997). Survey on the Effectiveness of the Comprehensive Sanctions Centers. American Probation and Parole Association Perspectives, 20(3).

  • Camp, S. D., Klein-Saffran, J., Kwon, O., Daggett, D. M., and Joseph, V. (2005). An Exploration into Participation in a Faith-Based Prison Program: The Bureau of Prisons and the Life Connections Program. Criminology & Public Policy, 5: 3: 529-549.

  • Gaes, G. G. (2002). Review of the book Reform in the Making: The Implementation of Social Policy in Prison by Ann Chih Lin. The Prison Journal, 82(3).

  • Gaes, G. G., Flanagan, T. J., Motiuk, L., and Stewart, L. (1998). Adult Correctional Treatment. In Michael Tonry and Joan Petersilia (Eds.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 26. Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.

  • Klein-Saffran, J. (1996). Bureau of Prisons: Expanding Intermediate Sanctions Through Intensive Confinement Centers. In MacKenzie, D. L. and Hebert, E. E. (Eds.), Correctional Boot Camps: A Tough Intermediate Sanction. Research Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 1996.

  • Klein-Saffran, J. (1995). Electronic Monitoring vs. Halfway Houses: A Study of Federal Offenders. Alternatives to Incarceration, Fall.

  • Klein-Saffran, J. (1991). Electronically Monitored Home Confinement: Not a Panacea for Corrections, But a Useful Tool. International Association of Residential and Community Alternatives Journal, May/June.

  • Klein-Saffran, J., Chapman, D. A., and Jeffers, J. L. (1993). Boot Camp for Prisoners. Law Enforcement Bulletin, 62.


     
    Equity and Diversity Issues back to top

  • Camp, S. D. and Langan, N. P. (2005). Perceptions of Minority and Female Opportunities for Job Advancement: Prison Staff and Beliefs about Equal Opportunities. The Prison Journal, 85: 4: 399-419.

  • Camp, S. D., Saylor, W. G., and Wright, K. N. (2001). Racial Diversity of Correctional Workers and Inmates: Organizational Commitment, Teamwork and Worker Efficacy in Prisons. Justice Quarterly, 18(2).

  • Camp, S. D. and Steiger, T. L. (1995). Gender and Racial Differences in Perceptions of Career Opportunities and the Work Environment in a Traditionally White, Male Occupation: Correctional Workers in the Federal Bureau of Prisons. In N. A. Jackson (Ed.), Contemporary Issues in Criminal Justice: Shaping Tomorrow’s System. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

  • Camp, S. D., Steiger, T. L., and Batchelder, J. A. (1995). Perceptions of Job Advancement Opportunities: A Multilevel Investigation of Race and Gender Effects. ORE report.

  • Camp, S. D., Steiger, T. L., Wright, K. N., Saylor, W. G., and Gilman, E. B. (1997). Affirmative Action and the "Level Playing Field:" Comparing Perceptions of Own and Minority Job Advancement Opportunities. The Prison Journal, 77(3).

  • Harer, M. D. and Langan, N. P. (2001). Gender Differences in Predictors of Prison Violence: Assessing the Predictive Validity of a Risk Classification System. Crime & Delinquency, 47(4).

  • Langan, N. P. and Pelissier, B. M. (2001). Gender Differences Among Prisoners in Treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13.

  • Saylor, W. G. and Gaes, G. G. (1999). The Differential Effect of Industries and Vocational Training on Post Release Outcome for Ethnic and Racial Groups. ORE Report.


     
    Recidivism back to top

  • Harer, M. D. (1995) Prison Education Program Participation and Recidivism: A Test of the Normalization Hypothesis. ORE report.

  • Harer, M. D. (1994). Recidivism Among Federal Prison Releases in 1987. ORE report.

  • Harer, M. D. and Klein-Saffran, J. (1996). Evaluation of Post-Release Success for the First 4 Classes Graduating from the Lewisburg Intensive Confinement Center. ORE Report.

  • Pelissier, B. M., Wallace, S., O’Neil, J. A., Gaes, G. G. Camp, S. D., Rhodes, W., and Saylor, W. G. (In press). Federal Prison Residential Drug Treatment Reduces Substance Use and Arrests After Release. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse.

  • Rhodes, W., Pelissier, B. M., Gaes, G. G., Saylor, W. G., Camp, S. D., and Wallace, S. (In press). Alternative Solutions to the Problem of Selection Bias in an Analysis of Federal Residential Drug Treatment Programs. Evaluation Review.

  • Saylor, W. G. and Gaes, G. G. (2006). Commentary About the Scientific Merit of the Post Release Employment Project (PREP). Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, DC.

  • Saylor, W. G. and Gaes, G. G. (1997). PREP: Training Inmates Through Industrial Work Participation and Vocational and Apprenticeship Instruction. Corrections Management Quarterly, 1(2).

  • Saylor, W. G. and Gaes, G. G. (1999). The Differential Effect of Industries and Vocational Training on Post Release Outcome for Ethnic and Racial Groups. ORE Report.


     
    Classification back to top

  • Harer, M. D. and Langan, N. P. (2001). Gender Differences in Predictors of Prison Violence: Assessing the Predictive Validity of a Risk Classification System. Crime & Delinquency, 47(4).

  • ....................................................................................................